Friday 24 June 2011

skype emoticons dirty

images skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • gbarquero
    09-11 04:38 PM
    Once for all, let's get this thing over NOW!!!

    LET'S GO TO DC NOW, OR WAIT FOREVER TO BE FREE!!!!!





    wallpaper skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. makeup Hidden Skype Emoticons
  • makeup Hidden Skype Emoticons



  • srkamath
    07-12 03:40 PM
    I'm killing my own joy here...... the Aug Bulletin says
    "Consular officers are required to report to the Department of State documentarily qualified applicants for numerically limited visas; the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services in the Department of Homeland Security reports applicants for adjustment of status."

    Documentarily Qualified (DQ'd)

    USCIS and Consulates submitted a list of Documentarily Qualified applicants to DOS on July 8th. The latest PD of the applicants on that list was before 01-June therefore they have set the PD at 01-June-2006.

    What is documentarily qualified?





    skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • dhesha
    07-18 10:18 PM
    called uscis to ask when july 2 filers are likely to get receipt notice.She said because of the load of apps expected it might take about 4 to 6 wks.I hope july 2 filers don t have to pay huge penalty for filing on the very ifirst eligible day:( (something to worry about till this journey ends i guess):(

    this 4 to 6 weeks is from 2nd July or 17 July?





    2011 makeup Hidden Skype Emoticons skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • Administrator2
    06-11 12:22 PM
    Everyone is again talking about ifs and buts. Guys why do not you put your hard work on what is more important than what is never ever going to happen. People with a GC, if this Bill passes, they are not going to renew your GC also. How's about that? People with a US citizenship, with previous GC status, they will not renew the USA passport, if this Bill passes. How's about that?

    So forget all these bogus bills, and support our main agenda, which is to remove the Backlogs. If you do not have any new news, then sit idle, but please do not spread these bogus out-of-world stories.

    Don’t think you understand so let me give it a shot.

    We just got off a conference call with our coalition partners. This is a real threat. Everyone, including some of the largest of companies on the planet think this is a real threat. It you are a lawyer or if you represent some law firm, then please go back and get busy with entering items like first and last name in a simple immigration form. This is not your area of expertise.

    Experts with this are saying that the language is deliberately kept vague. Some of the terms used in the language of the amendment do not have direct corresponding visa. Since we don’t trust the guys behind this amendment, we think they have deliberately kept the language which is not precise.

    Consider this as a kick-off for the election campaign. The real risk is, even if this amendment is defeated, between now and the elections we will all see many similar amendments. At some point Senators will be forced to vote on an issue which is pitched as “American citizens” v/s “foreign workers”. Experts believe that anti immigrants will try to push this amendment in middle of the night in the must pass bills.

    Some lawyer, for the purpose of pandering to the client base, is of the opinion that this amendment does not affect EADs. In the grand scheme of things this is plain wrong because he/she will not be asked to leave the country if such an amendment passes in the middle of the night. Just engaging in name calling Senator Grassley or calling the Senator pig face is not going to stop the amendment. Please grow up and get real. Your pandering may get innocent audience to believe that there is no real threat even when everyone with any real sense of expertise is scrambling to oppose this amendment.

    Immigration Voice and its coalition partners do not see this amendment in isolation. We are hoping for the best and preparing for the worst. And for the lack of clarity from the amendment language, we think that the intent of the amendment sponsors is to see us all out of here.

    There is no simple way for the anti-immigrants to throw us all out in a single stroke. They will always engage in systematic elimination of everyone starting from the most vulnerable. The language is vague and it could be interpreted in lot of different ways. It is not wise to look for the most favorable interpretation of the language to find reasons for not doing anything because in the end our interpretation will mean nothing.

    Let’s be smart, think for ourselves and act on our own behalf to send simple message requesting the Senate offices to oppose this amendment. What is so complicated about this? And if you don't want to participate, that's fine, but why would you discourage others from sending a simple message to the Senators from their state? Don't you have anything better to do?



    more...


    skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • perm2gc
    01-10 09:33 PM
    http://www.canadiandesi.com/read.php?TID=16132





    skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • McGuffin
    02-14 07:15 PM
    I'm in.



    more...


    skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • rajuram
    11-11 10:43 AM
    WE SHOULD try to MARKET HOW the high tech IMMIGRANTS CAN HELP THE HOUSING MESS BY BUYING HOUSES.

    Did anyone listen to NPR on this topic recently? Looks like people are open to the idea, but some one has to give more visibility to this topic. Can IV do it.....





    2010 skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • nomi
    12-13 12:21 PM
    I am sure that the IV core has already explored this option. We need some kind of feedback from them.

    ===============
    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
    - Mohandas Gandhi

    Slogan of the Linux community


    Sure... we will wiat for IV Core Team and their approval. I am writing letter to USCIS and then I will paste it here so you guys can also see and we can fix it and add or remove stuff from it and once we make it final then we will give it to core team so they can look and approve it or change it if they want. I will paste it here once i am done. Let keep it moving untill we get some feedback from core team .

    thx.

    nomi



    more...


    skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • ronhira
    04-10 10:40 AM
    Time and again I am telling. EB 3 problem is due to 245(i) cases. Once 245(i) primaries are over, their dependent will come into the picture, who are waiting back home. All 245(i) cases have PD before April 2001. For time being, EB3 I or Mexico move beyond April 01 but again retrogress back to the April 01 when cases are accumulate at CP. This is the reason why EB3 I and Mexico is not moving since last many years.
    If some one is not convince with me, request under FOIA
    1. How many cases filed under 245(i) in India, Mexico, and ROW
    2. How many cases filed under I 824 Follow to Join since 2007?

    what r u...... y don't u file foia to prove your twisted racist theories.... y r u always attacking mexican immigrants or 245(i)...... 245(i) was a LEGAL provision in the law...... who made that law..... congress....... assuming any merit to u'r racist theory.... y r u faulting the people who filed 245(i)..... y not fault the congress for passing 245(i) & not passing immigration bill....





    hair skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. images skype emoticons dirty.
  • images skype emoticons dirty.



  • mallu
    02-16 12:23 PM
    ......This per country cap law is very much like the tax code. If you change it to favor one class of people, you end up screwing everyone else. ...

    Currently, do chinese and Indians form a significant part of US population to affect diversity ? Just curious. I think one should start analyzing current US population and tabulate the % based on country of origin. Let us start with folks from UK, Italy, Ireland, Germany , Poland,..., India, China, ... . If it is found that some sections are less represented, let USA allow more into that category. True diversity.



    more...


    skype emoticons dirty. new skype smileys.
  • new skype smileys.



  • Windy
    09-19 11:41 AM
    I was there in the rally with few other friends. Some friends have already got their greencards. Still, they were there to support the good cause.

    Whenever I meet people in this area (especially Indians), they complain of not being able to switch jobs and the delay in green card and so on. There are thousands of greencards seekers in VA and MD area. I didn't see any of these folks who complained. They probably thought that someone else is anyway going to fight it out and they can sit back and enjoy the results without making any effort. It was a shameful thing that they did. Had these folks from VA and MD joined, there would have been over 10,000 participants.

    Still, the rally was a huge success and wants to thank IV for making this happen.





    hot skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty
  • skype emoticons dirty



  • ingegarcia
    02-15 04:40 PM
    What is the current % of India/China folks in USA now that threaten to affect diversity ? Also how many (% ) from Italy,Ireland,UK etc ?
    Anything published ? Just curiosity ( not questioning any current laws )..

    Agree and this is why they are trying to stop illegal immigration from latin american countries.

    BTW I am from latin america but I am not illegal :)



    more...


    house skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • qesehmk
    02-11 07:31 PM
    So, according to you, what happens when no action is taken for assigned visa number?

    What matters is number of visas used. Have you looked at the numbers?

    I actually was saying I agreed w you. Read my post again... I was trying to say a few things over and above...

    Aside from that, I have questioned Ron's correctness on this particular issue well before you produced that data.

    Also if people somehow do not want to pay attention to facts then so be it.. Why be rude?





    tattoo skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • gsc999
    07-24 05:05 PM
    Guies,
    Dr. Emilio Gonz�lez Ask USCIS is over, we were hoping atleast we get a mention in this chat, but like everywhere we do not even get a mention, thats our plight.

    That was the reason we were requesting IV to set up some kind of webfax to USCIS director, atleast he would be aware of the retrogression issue, then we can build our case from there.

    But any way it is a waste of time.
    ---

    It would be better to focus our energies in a directed fashion on some core issues that have been identified by the core team. Media, Senators, House members and other have become familiar with our issues. Will it be worthwhile to add these new provisons that might dilute our original charter? Let us address the key causes e.g. few immigrant visas, family counted towards visa numbers, re-capture past visas, increase immigrant visas etc.



    more...


    pictures skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty
  • skype emoticons dirty



  • dealsnet
    03-19 08:17 AM
    See Ron Gotcher's Immigration news letter.

    http://imminfo.com/resources/newsletter/2008-03Newsletter.pdf





    dresses skype emoticons dirty skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • sukhwinderd
    02-02 01:58 PM
    i can drive my minivan from zip code 32771 (orlando area). so 6 seats are vacant.
    i can pick up members from daytona beach area, jacksonville etc. if someone is coming from south florida, tampa area they can stop by at orlando and we can car pool from orlando.

    i need atleast one person who can drive at night, cause i cannot.



    more...


    makeup skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • Abhinaym
    07-03 12:01 PM
    I admit, it seems discriminatory to say you can't get your GC now because you're from this country or that country but these "high volume" countries have created the current back log through their sheer numbers and sometimes multiple applications, not the system. The system is fair to ALL and for some group to say that it isn't fair because all of that group isn't getting what they want is unjust to the rest of us. I knew I would be pounced upon when I submitted my original post and it only proves my point of personal agendas; sometimes I wonder what the "I" in "IV" really stands for? Don't be so arrogant as to believe that your higher education should give you more rights than others - that doesn't fly with me! I am frustrated with this forum because of this arrogance and I may not visit too much longer!

    I do have one question for all of you who are in favor of eliminating the per country limit; do you support an eventual road to citizenship for the large group of people who dominate the "other side" of immigration? If you don't, some may think you hipocritical to want the rules changed for yourselves!

    Ridiculous, nobody ever mentioned education here. Did any one here mention higher education at all?

    You want to get ahead of me in the line just because where I was born even if we're equally qualified, and you're calling me arrogant???

    Yes, our countries are 'high volume', how does it matter? Who are you blaming for what? Now what, you want to be commended and applauded for your countries' low population? :D LOL!

    Why is it so unjust to wait your turn?

    BS! IV has done so much for all immigrants and not just Indians. You should get your facts straight here. Besides this is a thread created for this purpose, there are plenty of threads which help you, if you ignore all of those and make your opinions on this you're being obnoxious. Also, the number of people in support of this petition is a tiny proportion of IV'ers. So stop stereotyping man, it is showing.

    You say that we applicants are to blame for our countries' populations? I.e. we're responsible for circumstances that happened before our birth? Could you get any more ridiculous please?

    I hope you begin to understand who is sounding arrogant here.





    girlfriend skype emoticons dirty. skype skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. skype
  • skype emoticons dirty. skype



  • senthil1
    02-19 12:28 AM
    What do you wish? You need gc the moment you enter the country? If anyone who stays 5 years get green card.That is excellent if legal or illegal immigrant. This is apart from 140K regular quota. This will reduce backlog substantially.

    If you are lazy enough to contact your representative and Obama, you should not complain for not getting your voice heard. Each and every email matter. Also contact Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee [D, TX-18] on her website. contact all. It wont take 5 minutes.


    Dear (Congressman/woman, Pres. Obama):

    Recently an immigration bill was presented in the congress. The HR 264 is embarrassing for legal immigrants.

    1) People who are illegal here for more than 5 years will get green card/path to citizenship but people who are legally here for 4 years and 11 months gets nothing.

    2) HR 264 says "continuous presence of 5 years". Of course illegal immigrants can't leave the country and they will fulfill this requirement, but legal immigrants can leave country so might have left country for even 3 or 4 months in last 5-6 years to visit home country or any other reason including business. Although brief discontinuity is said to be okay but what if some legal immigrant leave country to be his/her parents for 2 months in last 5 years? So, this continuous presence rule is tailor cut to include illegal immigrants and exclude legal immigrants.

    Is this what law abiding get when they follow rules? I request you to make sure that legal immigrants are ahead of illegals in every way. An illegal should not be awarded for being in US for 5 years while a legal, law abiding, tax paying legal immigrant is offered nothing for being in US for 3 or 4 years.

    Kind regards
    (Your name)

    https://writerep.house.gov/htbin/wrep_save

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/


    Now click on the links above and copy paste this stuff there. IT IS IMPORTANT....





    hairstyles new skype smileys. skype emoticons dirty. skype emoticons dirty. lmalave
  • skype emoticons dirty. lmalave



  • kumarc123
    06-11 10:31 AM
    OPPOSE the Sanders-Grassley-Harkin amendment S.AMDT.4319 in bill H.R.4213 which severely hurts Competitiveness, Innovation and creating jobs in America



    It will only take less then 1 minute of your time to click this link ImmigrationVoice.org - Advocacy -- OPPOSE the Sanders-Grassley-Harkin amendment S.AMDT.4319 in bill H.R.4213 which severely hurts Competitiveness, Innovation and creating jobs in America (http://immigrationvoice.capwiz.com/immigrationvoice/issues/alert/?alertid=15130466)

    and send the message out


    Please post this link on other forums and mail to friends asking them to join this action item.

    Sent.

    Thank you for your hard work.





    vishwak
    02-09 01:49 PM
    What exactly is this???





    ajay
    11-10 05:20 PM
    I will send.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment